Aimee Bender reads "The Fake Nazi" & Timothy Egan Sees Through the Facebook Craze

So Thursday night I’m in the (not quite final, as I’m still feeling it) throes of a sinus infection, weak and tired and congested, home in my cold Pennsylvania house, shivering and threadbare, listening to the mice scrabble in the walls (ok: now I’m exaggerating), and I have to get up and go out in the cold world to oversee a reading on our Penn State campus by visiting writer Aimee Bender, which at this point ranks as just-another-chore, or JAC, if you will. And from the introduction on, all my miseries fade away, and I’m swept up in Aimee’s reading of “The Fake Nazi,” a sad and whimsical story published last fall in Ploughshares, here:
http://www.pshares.org/read/issue-detail.cfm?intIssueID=133
I don’t usually go all rhapsodic over the power of art: Why? I take it for granted. I’m usually too busy to notice. As I hope is obvious, I love my favorite books and enjoy meeting the authors, but it’s also like wallpaper in my life—nice cowboy with lariat design, if I ever bother to slow down and consider it. Aimee Bender’s reading took me away, to a sad & funny place, beyond the humdrum world of revolution in the Mideast headlines, Jersey Shore antics, and whatever that Charlie Sheen person seems to be up to this week. Read the story. It’s good. And will no doubt be in her next book o’ stories.
On a less-ebullient note, Timothy Egan has a good piece in the NY Times about the contrast between rich & poor, now and then, England and the U.S., while writing ostensibly about “The King’s Speech” and “The Social Network,” here:

It’s good, smart, and cuts through the haze that is now surrounding the Wisconsin Budget Battle. When the smoke clears, you can see it’s about the rich getting richer, and trying to take away the power of the middle-class to even argue about it.

Posted in books, Social Networking | Leave a comment

"Out of the Wild: Venezuela": "Survivor" Meets "I Shouldn't Be Alive"

For days now I’ve been pinned by a boulder of work and only last night realized I had to saw off my arm like that (dubiously motivated) Aaron Ralston dude in 127 Hours . . . . So I watched the second episode of Out of the Wild: Venezuela, my new favorite show. (In fact the only show I’m watching right now. Everything else seems awful. Even Wrong Turn 2, featuring reality TV show contestants attacked by cannibals, was a disappointment.) But Out of the Wild most definitely doesn’t disappoint. It’s like Survivor meets I Shouldn’t Be Alive.  (I’ve seen the first two episodes in the last week, on Discovery Channel.) Here’s the set-up: A motley crew of volunteers get choppered down to an awesome highland plateau near Angel Falls in Venezuela, then have to hike out of the jungle, bitten by mosquitos, eating snakes for breakfast, munching on tropical plants, and generally looking tired, grouchy, and sodden. There’s no prize money. They have a GPS thingy they can press if they want to give up, and a chopper will come swoop them away. No hokey teams, no immunity idols. I’ve only seen Survivor once but I’ve seen clips of later shows, which looked more like bikini shoots. This one is no babe parade. They all look a little bedraggled and swarthy, even the blonde. Two of the guys hate each other and after only a few days are ready for some serious manslaughter, if not aggravated homicide. One of them would drive me up the wall, I can tell. But he’s the one catching the snakes for breakfast, so maybe I’d make nice. It’s one of the few ‘reality’ shows where they actually do look in physical danger. It’s almost cruel to watch them, hungry and bitten and miserable. But the landscape is gorgeous and dramatic, too. What’s not to like?

Posted in Bad TV | Leave a comment

Supercomputer Cheats on "Jeopardy," Ray Kurzweil and "The Singularity Is Near"

So I actually watched a bit of “Watson” the computer on Jeopardy, and it was obvious the computer seemed to have a huge advantage in timing, that he wasn’t pressing that buzzer gadget that slowed the humans down, particularly noticeable on the easier questions. ABC News reported last night that yes, the computer could answer in 1/100th of a second, faster than the humes (let’s invent a word!) could press that buzzer. Which is in effect cheating, if normally the humes are competing with each other for buzzer timing. Here’s a piece in the NY Times about the show: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=homepage
But a better comparison here, and one that will give you a more complicated perspective, is the fascinating/wacky nonfiction book, Ray Kurzweil’s The Singularity Is Near (2005) all about advances in A.I. and bold predictions for the future (Immortality, anyone?). It’s not a great book, but it’s charming in its loopyness. “Watson” actually reinforces some of his arguments, about the advances in computer power and abilities, including the reverse-engineering of the human brain, a way to get computers to have the creative and deductive power of humans. He’s very sanguine about it, but I find it a bit scarier, myself. And totally fascinating.

Posted in Bad TV, books | Leave a comment

J. D. Salinger Bio Sounds Good, and a Writers Party in Austin, circa 2006

So back in 2006 I was at an opulent writers’ party, a post-event thing at the Texas Book Festival, standing next to Frank McCourt and Maureen Down, Richard Ford and Jay McInerny, who today is reviewing a new biography of J.D. Salinger, here: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/books/review/McInerney-t.html?hp
I’ve always liked Salinger and admired his reclusiveness. This sounds like a good read. But back to that party in Austin: My best friend picked up a bottle of wine from somewhere (of course it was all free, great food and drink) and was heading upstairs with it, to hang out on the roof, and a caterer person asked him to leave the bottles on the tables please. He kind of slunk away, telling me later he felt like Ratso Rizzo in Midnight Cowboy, in the Andy Warhol’s Factory party scene, where he’s stuffing the sandwiches in his coat, and the woman tells him, “You don’t need to steal them, they’re free.” My other friend (female) tried to pinch Richard Ford.

Posted in books | Leave a comment

Hype Aversion to Facebook & Twitter, Nod to Evgeny Morozov's "The Net Delusion"

Leave it to the folks at the Urban Dictionary (who sometimes seem to have too much time on their hands: check out the P-words and you’ll get an idea of what I mean) to come up with a term for my response to the constant Facebook/Twitter tweets coming from the moronic media talking heads: Hype Aversion. Definition: “Rejection of an insanely popular idea, game, show, place etc. simply because it is so insanely popular.” That’s me all right. Although of course I’d say it’s more than “simply because it is so insanely popular,” more so because we hear about it too much. Frank Rich has a good piece about the myth of Facebook/Twitter’s power in today’s NY Times, specifically debunking the twin bogus “Twitter Revolutions” of Iran and Egypt. He also mentions Evgeny Morozov’s “The Net Delusion,” which sounds right up my socialnetwork-skeptical alley:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/opinion/06rich.html

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

In the Footsteps of Richard Alley: Mark Hertsgaard's "Hot: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth"

So today’s NY Times Sunday Book Review has a review of what sounds like a good book in the climate change library, HOT: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth, by Mark Hertsgaard, here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/books/review/Stephenson-t.html?_r=1&ref=books
I asked Richard Alley, in our parking lot climate change conversation, if there was any good news, and he said yes. After describing how ranchers/farmers were warming to the idea of wind farms, we agreed that the entrenched business interests of the old energy economy were inhibiting research/adaptation toward the new, and he had a good quote: “The people who will lose money from this shift know who they are, but the people who will gain money from this don’t, yet.”
And the reviewer wisely identifies a significant problem lies in our own country’s and culture’s dim-sighted refusal to believe in the urgency of climate change: “In fact, Hertsgaard’s reporting makes me wonder if there isn’t more hope for the Sahel than for the vulnerable South and Southwest of the United States. After all, why prepare for something — much less try to halt it — if you refuse to believe it’s happening? The American social context too often remains the largest obstacle, Hertsgaard observes, not only to adaptation at home but to cutting emissions globally. It’s not clear how to change this, but an honest, urgent, grown-up national conversation — beginning in Washington — would be a start.”
Obama’s bold (and very difficult) vision and plan for renewable energy is a shift in tone, shooting for a more politically feasible way to approach the problem—convince the culture that jobs will not be only be lost off of a foreign-oil-based economy to one based on local renewables. It’s a start.

Posted in books, Climate Change | Leave a comment

Climate Change Expert Richard Alley in the Parking Lot, Obama in the House

So yesterday President Obama visited Penn State and I wasn’t able to go, having to teach a class at that time, but the whole town (and my students) were atwitter with excitement, and irritation, because the traffic was all screwed up. I’m an unabashed fan of Obama’s, and was mildly disappointed that he came to town but I couldn’t get a ringside seat. Later in the day I’m at a local supermarket with my wife and daughter and a man walks by who I’ve seen on numerous climate change documentaries and programs, and I tap my wife and say, “That’s the climate change scientist.” It was Richard Alley, a world-famous global-warming expert, known for his ice-core analyses. He was leaving the supermarket at the same time as us, hopping onto his grocery cart and riding like an excited kid through the parking lot, to a car parked right next to ours. I went up and introduced myself, and we had a good chat. He’s a great guy, energetic, upbeat, a little kooky, as all us professors should be. (He was one of the few profs at Penn State I had always wanted to meet.) I asked if he had any good climate news and he said Yes, that there was a special coming up on PBS in a few weeks about alternative energy. He told some anecdotes about technological advances and alternative energy sources that have been known for some time, but are starting to be taken seriously, like wind and solar. If I’m quoting him correctly, he said we could 20% of our power from wind farms in the windiest areas of the Great Plains, and that the economic conditions were getting better for it, by paying ranchers for the wind turbine leases. It was one of those Meetings With Great Men, my wife and I standing in the parking lot and listening to him, trying to corral our daughter running around our feet. Way cool.

Posted in Climate Change, Politics | Leave a comment

On Neil Genzlinger's "The Problem With Memoirs," a Witty Look at Bogus Memoirs in NY Times, or a Book Review With Balls, plus a ShoutOut to Karen Russell's "Swamplandia!"

I haven’t been blogging much lately because I’m caught in a vortex of Academic Hell, coping with various problems brought on by our sickly economy, and here’s to hoping it will end soon: the bad economy, that is. Academic Hell is generally a netherworld of neuroses and anxiety—the flames are usually papier mache, and the ragged clothing includes crewneck sweaters. But I just read a great piece that is worth sharing, Neil Genzlinger’s “The Problem With Memoirs,” here in the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/books/review/Genzlinger-t.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&ref=books
Here’s a paragraph: “That you had parents and a childhood does not of itself qualify you to write a memoir. This maxim, which was inspired by an unrewarding few hours with “Disaster Preparedness,” by Heather Havrilesky, is really a response to a broader problem, a sort of grade inflation for life experiences. A vast majority of people used to live lives that would draw a C or a D if grades were being passed out — not that they were bad lives, just bland. Now, though, practically all of us have somehow gotten the idea that we are B+ or A material; it’s the “if it happened to me, it must be interesting” fallacy.”
Why I like it so much: The world of book reviewing creates parameters that generally dissuade the writer from negative reviews, even if those are sometimes the most insightful (and funny). Many years ago I reviewed for the NY Times until I wrote a negative review of a rather overstuffed novel, and that was it. That’s how the censorship goes. They pull the plug on you. (Genzlinger is an editor there, so he has greater leeway.) What I do now, instead of blasting a bad book, is refuse to review it. But that negates the nasty fun. I can live with it, of course. Karma and all that. But still, the only reviewer I light up at seeing his name in the NY Times tends to be Joe Queenan, who gets to say nasty, funny things, but often about old books, instead of the new. From my sometimes insider look at memoirs, I think Genzlinger is right. I know of a memoir out right now by a person I know (I won’t name names) that I think is pretty much 90% b.s. But you wouldn’t know that from the jacket copy. It’s about a dysfunctional family. A story we all love, right?
Right now I’m reviewing Karen Russell’s new novel, Swamplandia! and am glad to report it’s a fun read, about a smalltime alligator themepark in Florida. And it’s blessedly not a bad memoir.
Continue reading

Posted in books, writing | Leave a comment

"My Father's Guns," an essay remembered in response to the Tucson Shooting

Tim Egan had another good piece in the NY Times about the Tucson shooting and the gun control debate, here:

He mentions his family as gun owners and users. I have a similar history, though with more tragedy than I hope Tim Egan had to deal with. I published the following essay years ago, and think that it’s as relevant now as it was then. It’s titled “My Father’s Guns,” and appeared in the Houston Chronicle.
My Father’s Guns
My father died when I was too young to know how it happened, but I always believed that he died in his sleep. This was a disturbing thought when I was six and seven years old, especially at night, lying in the bunk bed below my older brother, because I had insomnia and chronic nightmares and, lying there in the spooky darkness, with the handlike shadows of the fig tree leaves waving at me through the window, I often wondered if I too could die in my sleep. If my father did it, why not me? It seemed like a peaceful way to go, like slipping your head into the warm water of the bathtub, but even if I considered entering it peacefully, eternal nothingness gave me the willies.
I vaguely remember my mother telling me, “One day, your father just didn’t wake up.”
We had a space heater in our room, and mother always told us to turn it off before we went to sleep, or the blue flames might burn off all the oxygen in the room.
“You wouldn’t want to wake up dead, would you?” she asked. Like papa?
We never talked about my father when I was growing up, and the only souvenirs we had of his existence were a double-barrel .410 shotgun, a .30-.30 rifle, and the disembodied bill of a sawfish he had caught off Galveston Island in 1949. The sawfish bill was a pale yellow, bony snout about three feet long, with a vicious row of teeth on either side. I was fascinated by this bill, by the yellowish teeth, thrilled that such an absurd creature could possibly exist. We kept it in the back of the closet of the boys’ bedroom, where my brother and I slept, and I took it out to look at it and play with it so often that some of the teeth fell out. By the time I was ten or eleven, it resembled a monstrous broken comb.
My brother was more fascinated by the guns, and he used to take me hunting in the woods around our house near the outskirts of San Antonio. As great white hunters, our routine was to walk slowly through the oak and juniper thickets, as quietly as possible, trying to sneak up on something and kill it. Once my brother shot a cottontail, and as we stood over it in the gray autumn air, blood sprayed on the brown grass beside it, it seemed to stare up in our eyes with a what-did-I-ever-do-to-you look. Mainly, though, all we shot were cactus, broad green blades of prickly pear. They were easy to kill. They couldn’t run away. You could walk right up to them and say, “I’m gonna kill you, plant!” And blast away. Nobody sympathizes with plants, not even vegetarians. You have to sing or moo for our compassion. Fur helps too. Or warm blood. Look at fish. Who defends the mackerel? The herring? The sawfish?
Tommy, being seven years older than I, inherited my father’s guns. This was fine with me at the time, because I knew I would never make it as a hunter. Once, in the Big Hole Valley in Montana, I shot at ground hogs in the fields with a .30-.30. I felt like a prairie hit man, sent from Detroit with a contract on the Marmota monax family. The pickup truck was parked on a dirt road, and we leaned against the hot hood for support. I purposely missed. My friend also had a gun, and I kept thinking that any minute he was going to shoot me. This was an irrational but persistent feeling. Maybe it was because I kept thinking about shooting him. Just a crazy thought, I know, but one that comes now and then. To prove my courage, I kept turning my back to him, whenever I had to reload. I squinted in the direction of the mountains and said, “I think I smell elk.”
Guns are always going off when you’re not expecting it, as if they have a mean streak of their own. I knew a Texas Ranger who had to carry his gun at all times, in case he needed to shoot first and ask questions later. He was fishing in a skiff in Aransas Bay when his .45 fell out of his holster, went off, and shot him in the face. The bullet went in below his jaw and out his cheek; he lost an eye and afterward wore a black patch. He was skinny, six-foot-six, had white grizzled hair, and wore stove-pipe Levis. With the black patch, he took on an almost legendary quality, and he continued to come into my family’s restaurant after the accident. He would place the gun on the table, in front of him, as he ate his chicken fried steak. He seemed almost inverted by the accident, somehow made bad, almost an outlaw. For some odd reason we laughed and joked a lot whenever he was there eating, and the merriment seemed forced, nervous, as if he had yelled at everyone “Dance!” and pointed his gun.
It wasn’t until I was seventeen that my sister Judy set me straight about my father’s death. “Boy, you’ll believe anything,” she said, when I somehow mentioned his dying in his sleep.
She told me he had blown his head off with a shotgun. Although that seems such an ugly way to put it, that’s how I remember it. And maybe that’s the best way to state something so catastrophic. Bluntly.
I later wondered if he had used that same double-barrel .410 that we used to hunt cactus with. Would my mother have let us use that gun? And even if it wasn’t the same gun, why did she let a nine- and a sixteen-year-old wander around the woods alone, playing Lee Harvey Oswald? (She always told us to take the spoon out of our iced tea glasses when we were drinking, because we might put our eyes out. But don’t forget your ammo!)
I remember those guns, how heavy and hard they were, how they hung from the walnut gun rack in our room, with a fishing rod on the top rack, the red and white bobber still clipped to the monofilament line, the treble hook stuck in the cork of the handle, how the guns smelled of oil, the serious click of the broken breach. Whose lives were we going to defend with those guns? Whose lives were we going to take? To end?
These thoughts disturb me now more than ever, replacing the fear of dying in my sleep I was once so naively obsessed with, because a few years ago my brother also used a shotgun to kill himself.
Of the three males in my family, two have now killed themselves with shotguns.
I don’t want to be the next.
I wonder if Tommy used the same gun he inherited from my father? But it’s not a question that’s easy to ask, not a question you perhaps want an answer for. The gun has not been passed on to me and has left the hands of the family, probably now stacked in a row of rifles in a San Antonio pawn shop, waiting for a family quarrel, waiting for a little disagreement among friends, waiting for action. I have no souvenirs left to remind me of my father’s life, not even the yellowish snout of the sawfish, lost years ago in a move from one house to the next.
The only souvenir of my father I own now is a handful of photographs taken of him after World War Two, when he’s young and smiling and his eyes are as blue as my own.

Posted in books, Politics, The West | Leave a comment

Sarah Palin Anthem: Sad or Funny?

A friend of mine (Thanks, Morris!) sent me this link, and I can’t decide whether it’s funny, or just sad. You decide.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ashleybaccam/sarah-palin-battle-hymn

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment