Review of Bruce Machart's "The Wake of Forgiveness"

Here’s my review of Bruce Machart’s debut novel, The Wake of Forgiveness, which appears today in the Dallas Morning News:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/books/stories/DN-bk_wake_1017gd.ART.State.Edition1.333f06a.html
It’s a good novel, and I could have written much more about it, but there’s a short word count for the DMN. One thing I touched on (lightly) were two scenes of night-time horse racing. One of the blurbs (always suspicious) referred to Machart’s “exactitude.” I don’t know if he’s right or wrong, but I do know enough about horse races that if you care enough to attend one, you’d like to be able to see it. There’s firelight in the scene, naturally, but that would only reach, what? thirty to fifty feet? Much is made of the expressions on the characters’ faces as they ride hell-bent through the night, one of them being a pretty “Spanish” girl, but how could you see any expression if it’s dark? Does it really matter? It makes for a romantic scene, and much of the novel is romanticized (scratch that “exactitude”). The hardbitten, dour characters are, for instance, awfully eloquent, even though I’d guess that, from the farm work described, they don’t spend much time with any “book learnin’.” And where do these pine trees come from? The closest pines I’ve seen in central Tx are near Bastrop, but that’s pretty far from his location. As I mention, the novel seems to follow a Faulkner/Cormac McCarthy tradition, and I’m a sucker for that.

Posted in books, The West | Leave a comment

On Timothy Egan's "The Big Burn" & the Obligatory Fall Foliage Photo

I recently finished Timothy Egan’s The Big Burn (2009) and rank it as one of the best nonfiction books I’ve read in the last few years. His analysis of the fight between conservative and progressive politics of the era, which mirrors to some extent our own today, are worth the read, but my favorite section is the description of the “blow up” that happened around August 20th, 1910—a hurricane-like explosion of fire, driven by winds up 80 miles per hour, that destroyed an area the size of Connecticut, and that killed @ 130 fire fighters. Owning a home in fire-prone Colorado makes it seem all the more real (and dangerous) to me, but I think it should be interesting to anyone, especially those readers with environmentalist sympathies.
And on that note, I can’t help but post a photo taken of Penns Creek in Poe Valley State Park, Pennsylvania. The leaves are peaking in my little corner of the world. Or as Denis Johnson once wrote in Jesus’ Son (1992), “The sky is blue, and the dead are coming back.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Malcolm Gladwell on Facebook & Twitter, or Making the World Safe for Wall Street Brokers and Their Cellphones

Since I’ve taken several jabs at the Brave New World of Facebook, I feel obliged to post Malcolm Gladwell’s excellent critique of Facebook & Twitter activism in a recent New Yorker. He’s reasonable, level-headed, and not nearly as shrill as I can be. And for all my rants, I find myself becoming a closet Facebook user, sneaking in the backdoor—I sometimes use my wife’s account to do something useful, which of course is a tacit admission that Facebook has its good side, obvious enough. I’m sure I’m blaming Facebook for movements it has nothing to do with, other than the general zeitgeist: i.e., the rise of the Tea Party Know-Nothing agenda.
I see it like a Matrix, sucking us in to a world based on screens. But, hey, I’m already there. There must be some balance, right? Time away from the screen. A good friend of mine tells me about his regular trips to Maine, where he stays in a cabin with no cell reception, no internet. How freeing it can be. I do the same in Colorado. But then we have to return to work, and the wired world.
Here’s Gladwell’s end to the piece, after recounting the anecdote of Facebook activism in which a Wall Street worker retrieved his friend’s Sidekick (expensive smartphone) in Clay Shirky’s “Here Comes Everybody”:
“Shirky ends the story of the lost Sidekick by asking, portentously, “What happens next?”—no doubt imagining future waves of digital protesters. But he has already answered the question. What happens next is more of the same. A networked, weak-tie world is good at things like helping Wall Streeters get phones back from teen-age girls. Viva la revolución.”
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=5#ixzz12ROAKdMZ
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell

Posted in books, Social Networking | Leave a comment

On Heather Sellers' "You Don't Look Like Anyone I Know," Ken Kesey, & Those Amazing Miners

First off, on this day of all happy days, how can you not be thrilled and chilled by the rescue of the Chilean miners. Like everybody else, I watched on TV and on websites. I was even made proud to hear that a Berlin, Pennsylvania-based company built the drill bore device that drilled the 2,000 plus foot hole. It’s all simply amazing.
Also in the good news category, this weekend I read an excellent review of a good friend’s memoir in the NY Times, here:

I met Heather Sellers in 1994, I believe, in Wimberly, Texas, at an event featuring none other than once-Merry-Prankster and all-outstanding novelist Ken Kesey. Wimberly is a small resort town in the Hill Country, with a few restaurants/barbecue places. Heather and I went to one of them for lunch and only one other table in the cafe was occupied. I leaned over to her and whispered, “See that guy over there? That’s Ken Kesey!” I wanted to go ask for his autograph but didn’t, afraid I’d be a pill. Famous writers deserve their space, too.
This was at a conference and later Kesey took to the stage to do a Merry Prankster performance. I heard it was good. I don’t know. Heather and I sat in the bar telling stories. She’s a peach, a powerful writer, and we should all read this memoir.

Posted in books, Weird Science | Leave a comment

Another Reason to Hate Facebook & Twitter

Frank Rich in today’s NY Times has a good summation of the role of “social networking” in the current Most Disgusting Midterm Campaign Season Ever: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/opinion/10rich.html?hp
Friends (the real kind) tell me I really need to get with it, get on board, become a Facebook user. Every time I start to buckle, I read something like this. But I will add this: I used to rail against cellphones (now it’s my only phone: “Goodbye, Landline”) until feeling the smart rebuke of a friend, who said, “Bill, it’s a utility.” He’s right.
I still hate cellphones—the annoying ‘talking over each other’ effect, the annoying ability to be reached everywhere and anywhere. But I use them.

Posted in Politics, Social Networking | Leave a comment

On Witches, Thugs, and Kooks: Or a Politician Near You, With an Apology (of sorts) to Jon Stewart

I noticed two good pieces on the (embarrassing) political choices we face in less than a month, Gail Collins in the NY Times, dissecting the weirdness in Connecticut:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/opinion/07collins.html?hp, plus another piece, which includes Jon Stewart on The Daily Show having fun with Christine O’Donnell:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/night-watch-talk-of-witches-and-an-apology/
Since everyone seems to be apologizing to someone, I’ll apologize to Jon Stewart for dissing him, because he made me laugh out loud. You get extra points for laughter, big time.
I’ve actually seen Christy O’Donnell in some of these sound bites and I can agree that she comes across as a likable-enough airhead, but Good Lord, not for a senator. I love the “I’m not a witch. I’m you” approach. It should be a slogan for our Wacky 2010 Election. Palatino in New York comes across as a thug, Angle in Nevada as a kook, and now we have a Witch, to boot! The fact that O’Donnell hasn’t been able to handle her own finances well enough makes her seem like another Reality Show Sleaze looking to turn a pretty face into stardom. Only in this case, she’d be one of only 100 voices on legislation for our entire country.  Unfortunately, I agree that in some cases, the Democrats have put up candidates who seem only slightly better. There should be a new reality show called, “Who Wants to Be a Politician?” We could give Immunity Idols (congressional districts) to some, and others, let’s just vote them off and let them make a bad scifi movie as punishment, like Sarah Palin, who would make a good alien/human hybrid cancer that takes over a country.

Posted in Bad TV, Politics | Leave a comment

On Jon Stewart, Bob Woodward, & Rick Sanchez, et al: or Media Phonies Against Obama

So with yesterday’s news that CNN fired Rick Sanchez over his angry (actually, I heard the thing, and it was more so a Poor Pitiful Me game he was playing) rant against his own network and Jon Stewart, among others, let’s take a breath and look at several examples of an acronym I just couldn’t make work: Media Phonies Against Obama, or MPAO.
Jon Stewart, who certainly has had many funny moments on The Daily Show and tends to be at least mildly amusing, is promoting his Return to Sanity event, but is starting to smell like he’s feeding from the same trough as Glenn Beck. He condemns Obama for what he hasn’t done, when it’s clear that Obama has tried (& succeeded, in some cases, and in others, failed) to do the right thing on several fronts, but is fighting the good fight against entrenched forces. His modest attempts to improve our healthcare system are labeled “Obamacare” and attacked by well-funded Rightwing forces. In the shameless category of Disinformation, MSNBC even had a headline last week (or “deck,” the text below the headline, to be more accurate) that referred to the (completely fictional) “death panels.”
Bob Woodward was on the ABC Nightly News hawking his latest book about the inside workings of the White House, Obama’s Wars (a deceptive title if there ever was one, considering both Iraq and Afghanistan are wars Obama inherited: he’s been in office less than two years, correct?), which he slanted horribly in the soundbite with Dianne Sawyer. He focused on one quote in which Obama essentially said American can and will absorb the brunt of terrorist attacks. What would Woodward have Obama say? “We’ll crawl in a hole and hide”? Hard to do with 300 million plus population. But what was not glossed over apparently in the book is Obama’s effort to get out of Afghanistan, to resist the U.S. military’s demands for an open-ended war. Woodward obviously thought that was less important in the soundbite category than trying to slant his words. He grinned smugly as he made it seem Obama was somehow treating terrorism lightly.
Jon Stewart tends to make easy jokes about complex issues, and sure, that’s the nature of late night comedy. But I admire Obama for standing in there and trying to do the right thing, not for laughs or ratings, but because he was elected to do a difficult job in a difficult moment in history. He doesn’t tend to whine (actually, I like him best when he shows real anger) or get giggly (the way Jon Stewart does). I’m not a huge fan of his economic team, but the idea that he could somehow completely overhaul our financial system is not simply disingenuous (which it is, in part), but rather dumb/dim. Wall Street power is not mythical. Banks and investment houses have vigorously fought his modest financial reforms, but he did succeed in something. The same with health care. It may not be perfect, but it’s something in the right direction.
And yes, I’m sure the Democratic Party officials wouldn’t be keen for that as a bumper sticker phrase: Obama: Something in the Right Direction. (Of course I did have a bumper sticker that read, “Kerry/Edwards—Para un America más fuerte,” but that’s another story.) In this era of Know-Nothing politics and Tea Party idiocy, perhaps that’s what we’re left with. Something. Anything.

Posted in Bad TV, Politics | Leave a comment

Timothy Egan in the NY Times on Legalizing Marijuana, or "California Dreamin'"

After my post yesterday of the CNN editorial about the failed War on Drugs, I have to call out Timothy Egan’s excellent op-ed in this morning’s NY Times, under the witty headline “Reefer Gladness.” He even knows the person who’s the inspiration of the Coen Brother’s namesake Dude character in The Big Lebowski:

As readers of this blog will recognize, I rate Timothy Egan as one of our best nonfiction writers, and I’m hardly alone: The Worst Hard Time (2005) won the National Book Award for Nonfiction, and I’m still reading The Big Burn (2009), which seems just as good. He writes about the West, generally, but also puts those issues in a national context, makes them important for all of us.
I don’t pay much attention to California politics, but I’ll be interested to see how the vote on Prop 19 unfolds, election night.

Posted in books, Politics, The West | Leave a comment

On HBO's "Boardwalk Empire" & the Current (New! Improved!) Prohibition

It’s two weeks into the first season of HBO’s Boardwalk Empire and I’m hooked: Being a sucker for Steve Buscemi, gangster movies/shows, and a long-time fan of The Sopranos, it’s no surprise that I like Empire, considering it’s done by Terence Winter, Sopranos writer/creator. Plus the first episode contains a line I’ve been known to toss out from time to time, “Read a fucking book” (usually this is in relation to the current trend of Know-Nothing Politics, such as the deniers of climate change and other idiocy).
Boardwalk Empire definitely makes Prohibition look glamorous, especially the first episode, with the raucous party scene. The cinematography is terrific, kind of lustrous and lush. Everything looks beautiful in that light, even some gangster getting whacked, to use a phrase.The young actor playing Jimmy, Michael Pitt, has that kind of leading-guy charm that used to be summed up with the line, “The camera loves him.” It does.
But this harking back to the Prohibition of the 1920s only underscores the futility of the Prohibition of the 2010s, that disastrous waste of time/money/lives known as The War on Drugs. Here’s an editorial that I think makes total sense, is not published in High Times, and contains all the cogent arguments for the legalization of marijuana that have been known for years, but seem to be getting more credence know, after decades of wasted time and effort. I applaud the writer, Bill Piper. It’s even in CNN, hardly a bastion of liberal thought:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/28/piper.decriminalize.pot/index.html?hpt=C2

Posted in Good TV, Politics | Leave a comment

Review of Joseph Skibell's new novel, "A Curable Romantic"

Here’s a url to my review of Joseph Skibell’s new novel, A Curable Romantic, which appears in today’s Dallas Morning News. It’s a quick review of a rather long (nearly 600 pages in the galley edition), complicated novel.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/books/stories/DN-bk_romantic_0926gd.ART.State.Bulldog.3343f4f.html
If I had my druthers, all book reviews would be 1,000 words long (usually my first draft), and all novels 250 pages (just long enough to be pleasing). You’d have to apply for a War and Peace Special Exception Permit, with Soviet-style multiple copies and inky stamps frowned upon by bureaucrats smoking foul-smelling cigarettes in dirty-tile offices with broken venetian blinds. You get the picture: a serious deterrent, but if you’ve got the moxie, keep on truckin’. (Rare to see that word combo.)

Posted in books | Leave a comment